Εισαγωγή (1η Εβδομάδα)
1. Τεχνοεπιστήμες, Διακυβέρνηση και Δημοκρατία: Ζητήματα και Προβλήματα στις Σπουδές Επιστήμης και Τεχνολογίας
Sheila Jasanoff, “Serviceable Truths: Science for Action in Law and Policy,” Texas Law Review, Vol. 93, pp. 1723-1749 (2015).
Sheila Jasanoff, “Governing Innovation: The Social Contract and the Democratic Imagination,” Seminar 597 (May 2009), pp. 16-25.
Darrin Durant, ‘Models of democracy in social studies of science’, Social Studies of Science, 2011
Μέρος Ι: Από την Πολιτική στην
Τεχνοπολιτική: Σχέσεις Συμπαραγωγής τεχνοεπιστήμης και πολιτικής (2η - 3η Εβδομάδα)
1. Κοινωνικο-τεχνολογικά φαντασιακά και πολιτικές Sheila Jasanoff (ed), States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order (Routledge, 2004).
Chapter 2, “Ordering Knowledge, Ordering Society” (Jasanoff) Chapter 12, “Reconstructing Sociotechnical Order: Vannevar Bush and U.S. Science Policy” (Dennis)
2. Τεχνικές Επιλογές Ως Πολιτικές Επιλογές
Gabrielle Ηecht, ‘Rebels and Pioneers: Technocratic Ideologies and Social Identities in the French Nuclear Workplace, 1955-1969’, Social Studies of Science, 23:3 (1996), 483-530.
Yaron Ezrahi, The Descent of Icarus (Harvard, 1990) Chapter 4, “Science, Experimental Politics and the Culture of Democratization”; Sujatha Raman and Richard Tutton, ‘Life, Science, and Biopower’, Science, Technology, & Human Values 35(5) 711-734.
Μέρος ΙΙ: Ειδήμονες και Ειδημοσύνη (4η-5η Εβδομάδα)
1. Ειδήμονες και η συγκρότηση των Τεχνοεπιστημών
Sainath Suryanarayanan, Daniel Lee Kleinman, ‘Be(e)coming experts: The controversy over insecticides in the honey bee colony collapse disorder’, Social Studies of Science, 2013
Christophe Bonneuil Les Levidow, ‘How does the World Trade Organization know? The mobilization and staging of scientific expertise in the GMO trade dispute’, Social Studies of Science, 2012.
2. Το τρίτο ρεύμα στις Σπουδές Επιστήμης και Τεχνολογίας και οι Επικριτές
H.M. Collins and Robert Evans, ‘The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience’, Social Studies of Science, 2003
Wynne, Brian (2003) `Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism' , Social Studies of Science 33(3): 401-417
Jasanoff, Sheila (2003) `Breaking the Waves in Science Studies' , Social Studies of Science 33(3): 389-400
Μέρος ΙΙΙ: Δίκαιο, Γνώση και Τεχνολογίες (6η -9η Εβδομάδα)
1. Ρυθμιστικό Πλαίσιο και Αξίες Adam Hedgecoe, ‘Scandals, Ethics, and Regulatory Change in Biomedical Research’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 2016.
Marie Andree Jacob, ‘Misconduct hunting: research integrity via law, science and technology’, Knowledge, Technology and Law, Emilie Cloatre and Martyn Pickersgill (eds.), Routledge (2015)
2. Ρυθμιστική Επιστήμη (Regulatory Science)
Sheila Jasanoff, “The Practices of Objectivity in Regulatory Science,” in C. Camic, N. Gross, and M. Lamont, eds., Social Knowledge in the Making (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011), pp. 307-337.
Sheila Jasanoff, “Ordering Life: Law and the Normalization of Biotechnology,” Politeia, Vol. XVII, No. 62 (2001), pp. 34-50.
3. Ρυθμιστική Επιστήμη ΙΙ
Klaus Hoeyer, ‘Regulatory Anatomy in Transplant Medicine’, Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol 40, Issue 4, pp. 516 – 538
John Abraham, Tim Reed, ‘Progress, Innovation and Regulatory Science in Drug Development: The Politics of International Standard-setting΄, Social Studies of Science, 2002.
4. Θεσμοί, Δικαστήρια και η Κανονικοποίηση της Τεχνοεπιστήμης
D. Winickoff, L. Busch, R. Grove-White, and B. Wynne, “Adjudicating the GM Food Wars: Science, Risk, and Democracy in World Trade Law”, Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 30 (2005), pp. 81-123.
Sheila Jasanoff, “Science and the Statistical Victim: Modernizing Knowledge in Breast Implant Litigation,” Social Studies of Science, Vol. 32, No. 1 (2002), pp. 37-70
Μέρος ΙV: Διακυβέρνηση και Δημόσια Συμμετοχή (10η-12η Εβδομάδα)
1. Επιστήμη, Αβεβαιότητα και Πολιτικές
Brian Campbell (1985) ‘Uncertainty as Symbolic Action in Disputes Among Experts’, Social Studies of Science, 15: 429-453.
S.O. Funtowicz and J.R. Ravetz (1992) ‘Three Types of Risk Assessment and the Emergence of Post-Normal Science’ in Sheldon Krimsky and David Golding (eds), Social Theories of Risk, London: Praeger, pp. 251-273.
2. Διακινδύνευση και Πολιτική Συμμετοχή
Javier Lezaun, “Subjects of Knowledge: Epistemologies of the Consumer in the GM Food Debate,” N. Stehr (ed), The Governance of Knowledge (Transaction Books, 2004).
Levidow, L., J. Murphy & S. Carr (2007) ‘Recasting “Substantial Equivalence”: Transatlantic Governance of GM Food’, Science, Technology & Human Values 32: 26-64.
3. Περιβάλλον, Δημόσια Συμμετοχή και Κοινωνικοτεχνολογικοί Μετασχηματισμοί
Phil Brown, “When the Public Knows Better: Popular Epidemiology Challenges the System,” Environment 35 (1993): 16-41.
Alastair Iles, “Identifying Environmental Health Risks in Consumer Products: Non-Governmental Organizations and Civic Epistemologies,” Public Understanding of Science 14 (2005): 1-22.
Γενικό Κλείσιμο (13η Εβδομάδα) Προβολή του ντοκυμαντέρ του Peter Galison, Secrecy (2009) σχετικά με τις Ψηφιακές Τεχνολογίες και την Ψηφιακή Δημοκρατία
